Foundations of Law and Economics

Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics

Russell B. Korobkin and Thomas S. Ulen

Year
2000
Venue
California Law Review
Level
Advanced
California Law Review cover
Archive-designed coverCalifornia Law Review

Summary

Argues that law and economics should replace its strong rationality assumption with a more empirically grounded account of human behavior. The article surveys evidence from cognitive psychology and related behavioral sciences, then explains how legal policy analysis changes when bounded rationality, framing, heuristics, and social preferences are taken seriously.

Citation

Russell B. Korobkin and Thomas S. Ulen. "Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics." California Law Review, 2000.

BibTeX

@article{Korobkin2000Law,
  title = {Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics},
  author = {Russell B. Korobkin and Thomas S. Ulen},
  year = {2000},
  journal = {California Law Review},
  url = {https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1117267}
}
Original source: Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository

Related Concepts