Securities Regulation
1994
Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver
511 U.S. 164 (1994)
Supreme Court of the United States
Issue
Private aiding-and-abetting liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.
Facts
Bondholders sued participants in a public financing transaction after alleged misstatements about land values securing bonds. Central Bank served as indenture trustee and allegedly delayed independent review of the appraisal, leading plaintiffs to assert aiding-and-abetting liability under Section 10(b).
Holding
The Court held that private plaintiffs may not maintain aiding-and-abetting suits under Section 10(b).
Reasoning
Justice Kennedy's opinion emphasized statutory text. Section 10(b) prohibits manipulative or deceptive conduct by a primary violator, but it does not expressly create private aiding-and-abetting liability. The Court declined to expand private liability beyond the conduct Congress had identified.
Why It Matters
The decision reshaped securities enforcement by narrowing private liability and shifting attention to primary violators, gatekeepers, and public enforcement.
Research Questions
- How does the rule affect information production, investor reliance, and enforcement costs?
- What are the likely error costs for lawful market activity and for undetected misconduct?
Case Text and Citation
Cite the reported decision as 511 U.S. 164 (1994). The linked copy is provided for reading access and may be hosted by a court, institutional repository, or secondary case archive.
Open case text: Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center