Securities Regulation

1994

Central Bank of Denver v. First Interstate Bank of Denver

511 U.S. 164 (1994)

Supreme Court of the United States

Issue

Private aiding-and-abetting liability under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.

Facts

Bondholders sued participants in a public financing transaction after alleged misstatements about land values securing bonds. Central Bank served as indenture trustee and allegedly delayed independent review of the appraisal, leading plaintiffs to assert aiding-and-abetting liability under Section 10(b).

Holding

The Court held that private plaintiffs may not maintain aiding-and-abetting suits under Section 10(b).

Reasoning

Justice Kennedy's opinion emphasized statutory text. Section 10(b) prohibits manipulative or deceptive conduct by a primary violator, but it does not expressly create private aiding-and-abetting liability. The Court declined to expand private liability beyond the conduct Congress had identified.

Why It Matters

The decision reshaped securities enforcement by narrowing private liability and shifting attention to primary violators, gatekeepers, and public enforcement.

Research Questions

  1. How does the rule affect information production, investor reliance, and enforcement costs?
  2. What are the likely error costs for lawful market activity and for undetected misconduct?

Case Text and Citation

Cite the reported decision as 511 U.S. 164 (1994). The linked copy is provided for reading access and may be hosted by a court, institutional repository, or secondary case archive.

Open case text: Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center