Foundations of Law and Economics
Introductory
Equilibrium
A stable outcome in which actors have no reason, given their preferences, constraints, and expectations, to change their chosen behavior.
Why It Matters
Equilibrium reasoning helps legal analysis predict how parties, firms, litigants, regulators, and offenders respond once a rule changes incentives.
Selected Literature
A short list of directly relevant archive entries.
1960
Introductory
2016
Advanced
2019
Advanced
Related Cases
1707
Foundations of Law and Economics
Keeble v. Hickeringill
11 East 574, 103 Eng. Rep. 1127 (K.B. 1707)
Property protection, malicious interference, and incentives to make productive use of land.
1805
Foundations of Law and Economics
Pierson v. Post
3 Cai. R. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1805)
First possession, capture rules, and the administrability of property rights in wild animals.
1854
Foundations of Law and Economics
Hadley v. Baxendale
9 Exch. 341, 156 Eng. Rep. 145 (1854)
Foreseeability, information disclosure, and limits on consequential damages for breach of contract.
1879
Foundations of Law and Economics
Sturges v. Bridgman
11 Ch. D. 852 (1879)
Nuisance, coming to the nuisance, and reciprocal conflicts over incompatible land uses.
