Financial Law

1996

Barnett Bank of Marion County, N.A. v. Nelson

517 U.S. 25 (1996)

Supreme Court of the United States

Issue

National bank powers, insurance sales, and federal preemption of state restrictions.

Facts

A federal statute authorized national banks in small towns to sell insurance. Florida law prohibited most banks from selling insurance, and the state insurance commissioner ordered Barnett Bank to stop.

Holding

The Court held that federal law preempted the Florida restriction because the state law significantly interfered with national bank powers.

Reasoning

Justice Breyer reasoned from the history and structure of national-bank powers. States retain room to regulate, but they may not prevent or significantly interfere with a national bank's exercise of federally authorized powers.

Why It Matters

Barnett Bank is a central banking preemption case and remains important for analyzing the division of authority between federal bank charters and state consumer or insurance regulation.

Research Questions

  1. How does the allocation of regulatory authority affect coordination, expertise, and capture risk?
  2. Which private or systemic risks remain outside the court’s doctrinal inquiry?

Case Text and Citation

Cite the reported decision as 517 U.S. 25 (1996). The linked copy is provided for reading access and may be hosted by a court, institutional repository, or secondary case archive.

Open case text: Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center